www.411mania.com
|  News |  Film Reviews |  Columns |  DVD/Other Reviews |  News Report |
SPOTLIGHTS  SPOTLIGHTS
MOVIES/TV
// Bar Refaeli and Ariana Grande Get in on the Sexy Twitpic Trend
MUSIC
// MIley Cyrus Tweets a Cleavage-y Pic
WRESTLING
// 411's Impact Wrestling Report 2.9.12
POLITICS
// Congress to Welfare Recipients: No More Strip Clubs, Casinos, or Liquor for You
MMA
// Nick Diaz Tests Positive for Marijuana Metabolites
GAMES
// Cover Art For Aliens: Colonial Marines Released


MOVIE REVIEW  MOVIE REVIEWS
//  The Grey Review
//  Underworld: Awakening Review
//  Haywire Review
//  Red Tails Review
//  The Devil Inside Review
//  My Week with Marilyn Review
 HOT MOVIES
//  The Dark Knight Rises
//  Captain America
//  The Avengers
//  Iron Man 3
//  The Hobbit
//  Spider-Man Reboot
SYNDICATE  SYNDICATE



411mania RSS Feeds





Follow 411mania on Twitter!




Add 411 On Facebook
 



 
 411mania » Movies » News



Advertisement
[Movies] Theatres Saying No to The Hurt Locker
Posted by Chris Lansdell on 03.10.2010



Summit Entertainment is trying to get the multi-Oscar-winning The Hurt Locker back into cinemas. Problem is, the cinemas are not interested. As an example, Regal Theatres turned the movie down outright not because of the film itself, but because it is already available on DVD.

Would you go and see the movie on the big screen now?


Post Comment (11)  |  Email Chris Lansdell  |  View Chris Lansdell's 411 Profile

  Send To Friend  |    Stumble It!  |    Digg It!  | 



Please add your comment below.
If you are registered, you can login and post under your registered name. If not, you can post as a guest or register.

* Please note that 411 moderates all comments. Your comment will show up on the site after it has been approved by an editor.
 
Name : 
Comment : 
Remaining Characters : 
2800
 

Comments (11)

 
I wanted to see it the first time, but am also a poor college student owing 20k in student loans with a job that gives me 12 hours a week. I'd still consider seeing it as it looks quite good, and seeing any movie on the big screen is still quite the experience. I bet they'd get a decent number of viewers.

Posted By: Ruiner (Guest)  on March 10, 2010 at 08:55 PM

 
 
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Posted By: Guest#0110 (Guest)  on March 10, 2010 at 09:04 PM

 
 
Yeah, but I'm probably in the minority who hasn't seen it yet. I can see why most would deny it though.

Posted By: Guest#0855 (Guest)  on March 10, 2010 at 09:06 PM

 
 
No, I have it on Blu-Ray which will be a better quality print then what the film is now.

Posted By: EricG (Guest)  on March 10, 2010 at 09:50 PM

 
 
lol i like the money alot but why pay 10-15 bucks on tickets wen u can just rent it?

Posted By: wylun (Guest)  on March 10, 2010 at 09:55 PM

 
 
This movie got the sympathy vote at the Oscars. Nobody saw it, nobody cares.

Posted By: MBD (Guest)  on March 10, 2010 at 11:17 PM

 
 
Seen this lastnight it's a good movie but it's not as great as everybody thinks

Posted By: Guest#8886 (Guest)  on March 11, 2010 at 12:10 AM

 
 
I saw it via Netflix last month? So why would I go see it?

I think the movie is overrated. I would have been pissed off if I paid to see it. The lack of action in a "real time" war movie is lackluster.


Posted By: Morgan Fisher (Guest)  on March 11, 2010 at 12:45 AM

 
 
i bet if it was in 3d the theaters would want it.

Posted By: Guest#4410 (Guest)  on March 11, 2010 at 01:31 AM

 
 
Well sounds like they just missed the boat on that one. If its out on DVD already most likely means it can be rented and people will not come out to spend the money in the theatre when they can just stay home and watch it.

And i am told its a good movie but an Oscar win can only do so much. You would think the bigger money maker is the repackaging and slapping on the dvd cover/advertising that it won best picture and should be a must own.


Posted By: Guest#7543 (Guest)  on March 11, 2010 at 10:57 AM

 
 
This movie got the sympathy vote at the Oscars. Nobody saw it, nobody cares.

Posted By: MBD (Guest) on March 10, 2010 at 11:17 PM

couldnt agree more,The movie lacked something...and only got the oscar's so that James cameron wouldnt


Posted By: The Reaper (Guest)  on March 11, 2010 at 03:38 PM

 


www.41mania.com
Copyright � 2011 411mania.com, LLC. All rights reserved.
Click here for our privacy policy. Please help us serve you better, fill out our survey.
Use of this site signifies your agreement to our terms of use.